Protecting Our

Natural Resources

Through Technology

» Home
» Introduction to Inflow & Infiltration - The Cause of Sewer Overflows
» Browse our Products
» Links
» News Archives
A SSO Example
» About Us
» Contact Us
News Article - Gloucester MA - Sewer and water improvements could tax city resources
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 1:15 PM
Subject: News Clipping : Sewer and water improvements could tax city resources

Sewer and water improvements could tax city resources

By Richard Gaines , Staff writer
Gloucester Daily Times

On orders from the state, Mayor John Bell has begun the process of putting $13 million into the antiquated George P. Riley Jr. sewerage treatment plant.

The mandated improvements would require the city to borrow $10 million and use $3 million from a previous bond sale. The new spending on the plant would be on top of $5.6 million recently invested to quell odors, replace components and neutralize the heavy dosage of chlorine used to kill toxins in the wastewater.

The order comes with the city in the midst of a mandated $30 million underground plumbing modernization to separate the combined storm drain and sewer system that overflows and illegally discharges untreated waste into the harbor when its capacity is overwhelmed, such as in a heavy rainstorm.

In addition, the city has been advised of the need to spend between $46 million and $58 million on its water supply system of reservoirs, dams, pumping stations and treatment plants over the next five years, bringing committed and proposed spending on infrastructure to more than $100 million.

A draft "water needs assessment" by the engineering consulting firm CDM was delivered to the city last May 30. A copy of the executive summary was released to the Times yesterday.

Public Works Director Joseph Parisi last June told the Capital Improvement Advisory Board that the city could effectively use twice that amount to modernize and expand its water and sewer systems.

Most borrowing would be supported by water and sewer rates, already thought to be among the highest in the nation. The sewer rate this year was set at $7.39 per 1,000 gallons, a 29 percent increase; the water rate was $7.02, a 19 percent increase.

The full impact of borrowing for the combined sewer overflow work has yet to be felt.

The administrative order for the sewer treatment plant improvements was signed by the mayor 10 weeks ago. It included $33,000 in fines.

The order was written by state Department of Environmental Protection, which was reacting to a March 2006 plant malfunction that discharged 20,000 gallons of untreated sewage in the vicinity of a storm drain connected to the Annisquam River.

Chief City Engineer David Knowlton requested the $10 million loan authorization last Wednesday in a memo to Steven Magoon, the mayor's chief of staff.



Magoon told the Times Bell would ask the City Council to authorize the borrowing.

"We'll send it forward," said Magoon.

Knowlton's memo also announced a tour of the plant today for councilors followed by a workshop and briefing on the balky, 23-year-old facility, which is one of only two left in New England that does not put sewage through advanced biological (or secondary) treatment before discharge into the Atlantic Ocean.

The administrative order was signed while federal and state environmental agencies are reviewing the city's application for a continuing exemption from secondary treatment, which would require an enormous capital outlay, perhaps $20 million, to expand the facility across Essex Avenue from the river.

The improvements "are necessary to enhance plant performance," Knowlton wrote to Magoon. They would be needed, he said, "even if the plant gets upgraded to secondary treatment."

The engineering consulting firm, Brown and Caldwell, which advises the city on its sewer system, was in the midst of a review of needs at the sewer treatment plant at the time the state intervened to require the improvements.

The Brown and Caldwell study was commissioned in the aftermath of a previous state order in March 2006 for upgrades in staffing and operation that followed a more serious malfunction.

In May 2005, the electrical system collapsed, and with the plant unable to pump treated sewage through the 9,000-foot ocean outfall, emergency pumps were used to divert about 600,000 gallons into the Annisquam.

Fearing contamination, the state ordered the clam flats closed, but the emergency communications system failed, so clammers went to work only to have their harvest confiscated.

The Department of Environmental Protection found the city had not met the deadlines for improvements ordered after the first malfunction. "Required dates didn't happen," Knowlton said in an interview. "A lot of things slipped."

The second order encompassed the requirements of the first, and added demands that the plant be retrofitted top to bottom with better record keeping.

The city is required to respond by May 1.

Brown and Caldwell advised the city to take on the plant improvements at once "because the systems and facilities have reached or exceeded their useful lives."



"A phased approach," the company wrote, was akin to asking for more trouble at the plant and risking violations of the existing permit and waiver from secondary treatment and harming the city's chances of having both renewed.

Earlier this month, EPA issued its final order to the city of Portsmouth, N.H., to upgrade to secondary treatment. The order leaves Gloucester's as the only major plant in New England still authorized to put its sewage through only primary (or chemical) treatment.

Brown and Caldwell acknowledged the problems financing the plant upgrades which include tanks, pipes, processors, electrical and separation systems. "There may not be room within the city's existing municipal bond cap to finance all of the proposed improvements," it wrote.

The water and sewer bill

* New request - $13 million for plant upgrades

* Previously invested - $5.6 million mostly for odor control

* Pipes and mains - $30 million to separate run-off from sewage

* Other upgrades - $30 million around the city

* Water system needs - $46 million to $58 million

Copyright © 1999-2006 cnhi, inc.

 

 
 
 
  Copyright © 2007 USSI, All rights reserved.