Growth under Fry-Ark tied to Fountain
woes
Colorado Springs mayor,
Pueblo
district attorney offer vastly different
views.
By CHRIS WOODKA
THE PUEBLO
CHIEFTAIN
The growth of Colorado
Springs and its impact on Fountain Creek was tied
squarely to the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project during a congressional
subcommittee hearing in Pueblo
Friday.
Two of the witnesses at the hearing,
Colorado Springs Mayor Lionel Rivera and Pueblo District Attorney
Bill Thiebaut addressed the issue of Fountain Creek
head-on.
“As our cities have grown, tremendous
strains have been placed on our water infrastructures,” Rivera told
the panel in his written remarks. “In Colorado Springs for example, we
have in years past seen catastrophic weather events and even
vandalism plague our wastewater system, resulting in sewer overflows
into Fountain Creek.”
Rivera noted the city has spent millions on
capital projects to repair nearly 1,500 miles of sewer lines and to
protect them from storms.
He went on blame part of the degradation of
Fountain Creek on agriculture, citing U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
reports, but cited ways in which Colorado Springs is trying to work
with farmers.
Thiebaut sees it
differently.
“Instead of being an amenity for downstream
communities, Fountain Creek is more like an open sewer running
through Pueblo,” Thiebaut told the
committee.
Thiebaut filed a federal lawsuit against
Colorado Springs in 2005 and is
battling Colorado
Springs attorneys to gain standing already
granted to the Sierra Club in a parallel
lawsuit.
Under questioning from Rep. Doug Lamborn,
R-Colo., who represents Colorado Springs, Thiebaut rejected
the idea of a “double standard.”
“Given that there have been pollution spills
in your own county, wouldn’t you agree it’s a double standard?”
Lamborn asked.
“Let me assure you, if I believed there were
violations of law affecting anyone’s health of welfare in my
district, I would take action,” Thiebaut
said.
|
|
Pueblo District Attorney Bill Thiebaut
explains how Fountain Creek issues are related to the
Fryingpan-Arkansas
Project. |
Thiebaut said the magnitude of the
violations - 73 million gallons in 100 spills at the time the
lawsuit was filed - convinced him to take legal
action.
Rivera countered that most of the volume
from the spills occurred during a series of storms in 1999. In
response to a question by the subcommittee’s chairman, Rep. Grace
Napolitano, D-Calif., Rivera said Colorado Springs has a good track
record for conservation, as well as reuse of some wastewater for
public landscaping and power plants.
Alluding to state compliance orders which
have required Colorado Springs to
meet certain deadlines on wastewater repairs since 2003, Thiebaut
criticized the federal government’s stance on water quality control
in Colorado.
“We must recognize the value of preserving
high-quality waters, stop gutting the power of water quality
administrators and provide adequate funding and teeth for
enforcement,” Thiebaut said. “The Fryingpan-Arkansas Project must be
managed and evolved to support these goals, not work to defeat
them.”
Asked to expand on that remark by Rep. Mark
Udall, D-Colo., Thiebaut replied:
“What I’m experiencing is that our state
regulators are sitting down with the polluters to try to fix the
problems,” Thiebaut said. “I find it odd there is no public
engagement until only after a deal is
cut.”